30 MINUTES OF LESS

BY CHRISTOPHER HASKELL
DECEMBER 14, 2011

Please explain to me, with a cast of established comedians and well-known actors, how the newest comer is the film’s highlight. “30 Minutes Or Less” is a launching pad for Aziz Ansari. If you’ve caught the television series “Parks & Recreation,” you already know his exceptional delivery. However, a comedian that outshines a 2010 Academy Award nominee is saying something.

Before “The Social Network,” Jesse Eisenberg was known for his awkward brand of humor, creating enjoyable performances in both “Adventureland” and “Zombieland” in 2009. Then 2010 rolled around, and Eisenberg picked up a Best Actor nomination at the Oscars for his performance in the overly hyped film “The Social Network.” From now on, it seems that it will be hard to buy Eisenberg in any of these teenage comedies. But it will also be equally hard not to feel like he has become slightly smug, which is the case with his performance in “30 Minutes Or Less.”

Eisenberg plays the lead role of Jake, a pot-smoking pizza delivery driver in Grand Rapids, MI. His demeanor is half-hearted and uninspired, as is most of the plot. Dwayne (Danny McBride) and his best friend Travis (Nick Swardson) decide to quit living under Dwayne’s wealthy father (Fred Ward). To do so, they enlist the help of a stripper named Juicy (Bianca Kajlich) and her assassin boyfriend, Chongo (Michael Pena), to take his father out of the equation. However, before Chongo helps, he needs $10,000. How better to get the money than to strap a bomb to a pizza delivery driver and force him to rob a bank for them? Despite everyone in the film being slow-witted, the idea is dumb enough to work.

Aside from some beautiful arguments between Eisenberg and Ansari, the film is rather bland, with a formulaic plot that hardly pays off. Tossed in the middle of the storyline is a haphazard romance between Jake and Chet’s (Ansari) twin sister, Kate (Dilshad Vadsaria), to which Chet disapproves. That causes the conflict that makes the film more fun. The film does open nicely with Jake driving around recklessly in his pizza delivery car. Still, the film falls flat without any spectacle piecing it together, lacking urgency and contrived action sequences. Though it is always nice to see Danny McBride and Nick Swardson, Aziz Ansari steals the show and proves that he has become the next big name in comedy.

RELEASE DATE
August 12, 2011

DIRECTOR
Ruben Fleischer

WRITTEN BY
Michael Diliberti
Matthew Sullivan (story by)

STUDIO
Sony Pictures
Columbia Pictures

R
(for crude and sexual content, pervasive language, nudity and some violence)

ACTION
COMEDY
CRIME
83 minutes

CINEMATOGRAPHER
Jess Hall

COMPOSER
Ludwig Göransson

EDITOR
Alan Baumgarten

CAST
Jesse Eisenberg
Danny McBride
Aziz Ansari
Nick Swardson
Michael Peña
Fred Ward
Bianca Kajlich
Brett Gelman

PRODUCED BY
Stuart Cornfeld
Ben Stiller
Jeremy Kramer

BUDGET
$28 million

6 responses to “Movie Review: 30 Minutes Or Less (2011)”

  1. Paragraph Film Reviews Avatar
    Paragraph Film Reviews

    I liked the two rednecks but didn’t think the script was anything near as good for Eisenberg to properly shine. As you say, the n00b is probably the best ‘comedian’ here. Bit of a sloppy, messy, bat-shit-crazy ending!

    1. You’re absolutely right. Look at the Zombieland script and how well that worked for Eisenberg. It almost seemed written for him while 30 Minutes or Less just seemed to shove him into a role that he wasn’t necessarily right for. The bickering scenes between Eisenberg and Ansari could have been perfect given the right person in the role or the right attention shown to Eisenberg’s character. Also, I had a huge problem with how easy it was to rob a bank. No failed attempts, no build-up, just in and out with no problems. Completely frustrating.

  2. Thiis one just never interested me, but I suppose I will see it one day.

    Awesome blog and welcome to LAMB!

    1. You probably aren’t missing much. I am becoming a huge fan of Aziz though, so any little film like this helps.

  3. This is no comedy classic, but it delivers plenty of laughs, thanks to a witty script and no less than five very hilarious performances. Good review.

    1. Not a classic at all, when it easily could have been given the right amount of comedy from these guys. It’s more of a one and done type of film that I really have no need to see again, which is awful, especially for a comedy.

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from No Bad Movie

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading